<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GUIMark 2: The rise of HTML5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.craftymind.com</link>
	<description>Hacking away at UI development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:37:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pharma feedback</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-23502</link>
		<dc:creator>pharma feedback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-23502</guid>
		<description>Two years ago I had an itch that needed scratching. &quot;RIA&quot; was the future of the web and every major company seemed to have a solution to get us there. I developed the first version of GUIMark to not only get a good understanding of the respective technologies, but also to give my clients through EffectiveUI and everyone else something to actively gauge the rendering performance of the different runtimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago I had an itch that needed scratching. &#8220;RIA&#8221; was the future of the web and every major company seemed to have a solution to get us there. I developed the first version of GUIMark to not only get a good understanding of the respective technologies, but also to give my clients through EffectiveUI and everyone else something to actively gauge the rendering performance of the different runtimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benchmark comparativo di browsers Android</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-23218</link>
		<dc:creator>Benchmark comparativo di browsers Android</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-23218</guid>
		<description>[...] propone un risultato totale e un risultato parziale per ogni istruzione presa in esame. GUIMark 2, in particolare la versione mobile del benchmark, simula due videogame web-based, e dà come [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] propone un risultato totale e un risultato parziale per ogni istruzione presa in esame. GUIMark 2, in particolare la versione mobile del benchmark, simula due videogame web-based, e dà come [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update IV &#171; Halbprofessionelle Browserbenchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-23105</link>
		<dc:creator>Update IV &#171; Halbprofessionelle Browserbenchmarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-23105</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8217;08, Maze Solver, Asteroids HTML5 Canvas 2D Rendering and JavaScript Benchmark, Dromaeo, GUI Mark 2 und [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8217;08, Maze Solver, Asteroids HTML5 Canvas 2D Rendering and JavaScript Benchmark, Dromaeo, GUI Mark 2 und [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML5</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-22976</link>
		<dc:creator>HTML5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22976</guid>
		<description>http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui1.jpg

http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui2.jpg

http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui3.jpg

HTML5 browsers totally annihilates Flash now in performance, it&#039;s not even a contest anymore, Flash is outdated, obsolete relic of the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui1.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui2.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.conceivablytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/gui3.jpg</a></p>
<p>HTML5 browsers totally annihilates Flash now in performance, it&#8217;s not even a contest anymore, Flash is outdated, obsolete relic of the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mem's</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-22952</link>
		<dc:creator>Mem's</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22952</guid>
		<description>Hi, I made an update for your flash text demo, using the FTE instead of standard TextField class.

Here the source + assets:
http://memmie.lenglet.name/documents/lab/FlashFTETextTest.zip

It&#039;s use flash.text.engine classes to emulate a standard TextField to test performances. It&#039;s not perfect, but work correctly for this demo. I&#039;m pretty sure (but I tested only on few mac browsers) that using FTE is better than TextField.

FTE need CFF fonts (OTF). I convert your both fonts (Champignon and Star Jedi) with FontForge but I didn&#039;t found the correct way to embed these fonts directly with Flex SDK (with font embed metatag) without getting errors. So, I compile a SWF file with Flash Pro CS5.5 and embed its symbols (fonts class) with class embed metatag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I made an update for your flash text demo, using the FTE instead of standard TextField class.</p>
<p>Here the source + assets:<br />
<a href="http://memmie.lenglet.name/documents/lab/FlashFTETextTest.zip" rel="nofollow">http://memmie.lenglet.name/documents/lab/FlashFTETextTest.zip</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s use flash.text.engine classes to emulate a standard TextField to test performances. It&#8217;s not perfect, but work correctly for this demo. I&#8217;m pretty sure (but I tested only on few mac browsers) that using FTE is better than TextField.</p>
<p>FTE need CFF fonts (OTF). I convert your both fonts (Champignon and Star Jedi) with FontForge but I didn&#8217;t found the correct way to embed these fonts directly with Flex SDK (with font embed metatag) without getting errors. So, I compile a SWF file with Flash Pro CS5.5 and embed its symbols (fonts class) with class embed metatag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppold</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-22929</link>
		<dc:creator>ppold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22929</guid>
		<description>Why didn&#039;t you use FTE for the text column test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why didn&#8217;t you use FTE for the text column test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-2/#comment-22772</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22772</guid>
		<description>Great work!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-1/#comment-22741</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22741</guid>
		<description>after a few test i can safely say ie9 is the better browser now!(http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Browser/TrackingProtectionLists/Default.html)dont forget to activate active x protection (then you can disable selectily)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after a few test i can safely say ie9 is the better browser now!(http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Browser/TrackingProtectionLists/Default.html)dont forget to activate active x protection (then you can disable selectily)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-1/#comment-22708</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22708</guid>
		<description>SeaMonkey/2.1b3 x32 + Flash 10.3 on Win 7 x32 sp1

Vector charting
HTML 5 23.58 fps
Flash 49.53 fps

Bitmap Gaming Test
HTML 5 58.84 fps
Flash 49.16 fps

Text Column Test
HTML 5 41.77 fps
Flash 29.12 fps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SeaMonkey/2.1b3 x32 + Flash 10.3 on Win 7 x32 sp1</p>
<p>Vector charting<br />
HTML 5 23.58 fps<br />
Flash 49.53 fps</p>
<p>Bitmap Gaming Test<br />
HTML 5 58.84 fps<br />
Flash 49.16 fps</p>
<p>Text Column Test<br />
HTML 5 41.77 fps<br />
Flash 29.12 fps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol</title>
		<link>http://www.craftymind.com/guimark2/comment-page-1/#comment-22659</link>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.craftymind.com/?page_id=98#comment-22659</guid>
		<description>update!the java trick jesperjuul had publish no longer work in minefield as of this week i would have thot mozilla would try to take advange of this trick in some way in firefox but it seems to be the reverse so now silverlight is the only true fast option.and by a lot!before?silverlight was only 2 time faster then the fastest thing avail anywhere!just thot i would let you guys know about java.ho not because there isnt speed in java the trouble is ms have bug and lot of trick for it arent widelly used !(or widely unknown to most!  i guess)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update!the java trick jesperjuul had publish no longer work in minefield as of this week i would have thot mozilla would try to take advange of this trick in some way in firefox but it seems to be the reverse so now silverlight is the only true fast option.and by a lot!before?silverlight was only 2 time faster then the fastest thing avail anywhere!just thot i would let you guys know about java.ho not because there isnt speed in java the trouble is ms have bug and lot of trick for it arent widelly used !(or widely unknown to most!  i guess)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

